KPOG

 

 

Kiawah Island Property Owners Group

 

The Development Agreement

from Kiawah Island TALK, April 2005

 

The Development Agreement (DA) is one of the top three concerns of Kiawah property owners based on results from the just completed KPOG survey and discussions during the 2004 campaign for Mayor and Town Council.  The Developer (KRA) recently requested an extension of the 1994 DA which expires January 1, 2008.  Its contents apply to the entire Island, both inside and outside the Main Gate, and along the Kiawah Island Parkway to Betsy Kerrison Parkway.

KPOG believes it’s important that property owners have unbiased facts available to them so they may voice educated opinions during the discussions between the Town and KRA.  This article provides some critical background information on the existing Development Agreement.

Town Notes for June 10, 1994 and September 27, 1994, quoted liberally in this article, provided property owners with a great deal of information about the Development Agreement, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Zoning Ordinances approved that Fall.  They are available in their entirety at www.kiawah.org.  Clarifying comments are presented in brackets ([]).  The September 1994 issue “strongly encourage(d) every property owner to read and become familiar with all three documents, particularly if Kiawah is important in your personal future.”  That advice remains sound today.

What is a Development Agreement?  “A development agreement is a contract between a developer and a municipality.  It is the vehicle that allows the municipality to provide certain assurances and incentives to a developer and in return receive benefits for the community as a part of the development process.”  It assures a developer (in this case, KRA) that zoning regulations will remain unchanged throughout the duration of a large project, and minimizes uncertainty for financial backers who may be underwriting portions of the project.

The Town/KRA’s Development Agreement.  The 1994 DA is a 12.4 pound, four inch thick, 300+ page legal contract between the Town of Kiawah and the Island’s developer.  This agreement, plus the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, and Land Use Planning and Zoning Ordinances (Article 12), all approved in1994, control all development on Kiawah.  These documents replaced the original Planned Development District Plan (PDD–1a) executed in 1975 between the Kuwait Investment Corp. (that owned Kiawah from 1974-1988) and Charleston County.  That plan was subsequently adopted by the Town as its Planning and Zoning Ordinance shortly after Kiawah Island became a municipality in 1988.

The DA was negotiated over a 16-month period and executed on September 16, 1994.  It conferred certain rights and obligations to both signatories, and imposed restrictions on the Community Association which is not a party to this agreement.  In simplest terms, KICA must abide by all terms of the agreement or risk the agreement becoming null and void. 

What benefits did KRA get in the 1994 agreement?  The Town surrendered most of its land use planning and zoning power, and that of future Councils, for a period of 14 years.  This power was passed to KRA and their Architectural Review Board (ARB).  The agreement locked in zoning, i.e., what areas would be single family or multifamily residential, resort, or commercial.  However, for KRA’s undeveloped residential-zoned properties, the ARB (controlled by KRA) could deviate from lot standards (such as setbacks or coverage) without recourse to public or Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) review.  The ARB is the ultimate arbiter for these properties.

In the course of drafting the DA, Town Council compared terms of the agreement with the 1994 Comprehensive Plan.  They noted the following benefits KRA derived from the DA as follows, and as detailed in the June 10, 1994 Town Notes. 

  • The Plan allows an additional 1500 dwelling units for a total of 5130 [maximum] – the Agreement allows an additional 1974 dwelling units for a total of 5600.  [The maximum number of dwelling units permitted in PDD–1a was approximately 7,000 units.]

  • The Plan allows 400,000 sq. ft. of commercial space – the Agreement allows 485,000 sq. ft. 

  • The Plan recognizes only two sites, East Beach and West Beach as hotel sites – the Agreement adds a small site adjacent to East Beach and a large site adjacent to Beachwalker Park. [For a total of 325 rooms]

  • The Plan is strongly oriented toward single family housing – the Agreement allows additional multi-family housing. 

  • The Plan is very restrictive on the types of commercial activities allowed – the Agreement broadens the types allowed. 

  • The Plan would allow selective use of housing densities up to 6 units/acre – the Agreement, in some locations, allows multi-family (12 units/acre).

  • The Plan limits hotels to 4 stories and 50 feet above the first floor level – the Agreement allows hotel heights of 70 feet and 6 stories. 

  • The Plan delegates control of standards (e.g. setbacks, buffers, etc.) to the Planning Commission – the Agreement divides the island into “developed” and “undeveloped” areas and gives the Developer much greater latitude [control] in the “undeveloped” areas.

  • The Plan calls for 100 off-street beach parking spaces behind the Vanderhorst Gate (for an island total of 217) – the Agreement allows 42 of the spaces to be on-street parking.

  • The Plan calls for the Rhett’s Bluff Landing Park to be open access with no fee to all property owners – the Agreement permits retention of the fee but reduces it to a token amount.

  • The Plan calls for an extensive park system for the property owners including active recreation areas – the Agreement accepts Rhett’s Bluff Landing, Bear Island, Captain Sam’s Spit, and a park at Blue Heron Pond as the totality of new parklands.  The Agreement also includes transfer of the lands between the high water line on the beach and the beach front lots to the Community Association, and a new bike trail along Flyway Drive from Governor’s Drive to Glen Abbey. 

What benefits did the Town receive in the 1994 agreement?  KICA and, to some extent, the Town also received benefits.  These benefits included:

  • Transition of KICA from Developer control to property owner control

  • Acquisition of various properties.  In addition to the recreation areas listed above, these include the Sandcastle facility property, the Sora Rail maintenance tract, and property for the second fire station behind the second gate.

KICA was also free to transfer the Kiawah Island Parkway from Betsy Kerrison to the Main Gate to the Town.  This transfer relieved KRA of responsibility of 4-laning the Parkway and transferred the cost of Parkway maintenance to the Town.

Transfer of control of KICA to property owners was the Town’s primary motivation for entering this agreement.

What is KRA now proposing to the Town?  KRA recently approached Town Council with a proposal to extend the current DA  “with few, if any revisions”  for a period of 10 years.  In a letter to Kiawah property owners dated February 15, 2005, Mr. Darby said, “… KRA is not asking for any new land to be included nor for relaxation of any rules.  We seek merely an extension of the status quo to undertake the remaining development at Kiawah with care and optimal timing.”  (Mr. Darby’s boldface and italics)  What Mr. Darby has not done in his letter is to describe the ‘status quo’, which actually includes the following:  

  • KRA has the right to develop Cougar Island, the largest remaining undeveloped parcel on Kiawah.  A total of 375 single family homes can be built on this 250-acre tract.

  • KRA has the right to build condos or commercial properties on approximately 8.5 acres adjacent to the Resort’s Mingo Point, just outside the Main Gate. 

  • KRA has the right to build a 325-room, 6-story hotel adjacent to Beachwalker Park.  (These first three items are specified in the 1994 DA, Exhibit 13.2: Parcel-Specific Development Standards.) 

  • The ARB retains control over virtually all building on the Island, and the freedom to relax rules when it is to its advantage to do so.

  • While KRA has transitioned control of KICA to property owners, it retains a tight grip on that body.  According to an article in January 1995’s TALK written by then KICA Property Owner Directors Tug Greer and Laura Pulleyn, even after transition, “. . . there are a huge number of constraints which greatly limit the authority of the board majority.”  The article goes on to say that KICA’s Operating Standards Manual, insisted upon by KRA, gives KRA Directors control over 41% of the operating budget and “. . .an equal vote on the use of all reserve funds even after Property Owner Directors have a 6 to 1 majority on the board.”  Further, “It is highly questionable whether control of the board has really been transferred to Property Owner Directors if, even when we have a 6 to 1 majority, we are constrained in the budget allocation process, we cannot even change our legal counsel, and cannot propose to the membership a change in the KICA covenants.”  They conclude that, “The control which passes to property owners prior to 2008 is greatly restricted.”

  • In 1994, KRA had 1700 acres of undeveloped property.  Today, approximately 330 acres remain.  Eighty percent (80%) of their original holdings have been platted and sold to others.

Now what?  At KPOG’s March 5 Annual Meeting, Councilman Don McIver, standing in for the Mayor, stated that the Town is now involved in closed-door discussions with KRA about the 1994 DA.  He emphasized that no negotiations had begun and there would be “little public discussion” until there is an outline of the proposed new agreement. 

Prior to signing the current DA, the 1994 Town Council held three public hearings, had additional public meetings, and a four day session where the Agreement and its exhibits were on display and Council Members were available to answer questions.  They also solicited recommendations from the Planning Commission which held an additional hearing.  This type and intensity of discussion is healthy, and even more critical now that the number of stakeholders here on the Island has expanded significantly and KRA’s undeveloped property stake is only 20% of their original holdings. 

Questions for consideration.  How much development is enough?  Assuming KRA develops Cougar Island according to standards set forth in the 1994 DA, we can expect well over 300 additional housing units at the east end of the Island.  The first phase of Freshfields is opening this spring.  While it will offer many conveniences to Kiawah’s property owners and visitors, it is still too early to project the impact this development will have on traffic and other intangible quality of life issues.  (We know that property owner concerns about maintaining natural buffers around the site is one of the top three issues for respondents to KPOG’s 2005 survey.)  Do we want additional high density (up to 12 units/acre) or commercial construction currently permitted by the 1994 DA right outside the Main Gate?

The Sanctuary, Kiawah Island Golf Resort’s new hotel, opened in August 2004 and has established itself as a key asset to the Island.  Does the Island need yet another hotel at Beachwalker Park, as permitted by the 1994 DA?

How much control over the Island should KRA retain as its holdings are sold off?  We need to analyze whether the authority of the ARB should be shared with or transferred to our Community Association as Seabrook has done.  Should constraints which greatly limit the authority of KICA’s property owner majority be eliminated? 

In its opening gambit, KRA has done what any smart negotiator will do.  It has asked for an extension of the entire agreement with “few, if any, revisions.”  While there is less undeveloped land up for sale now than there was in 1994, the development of what remains could potentially forever alter the character of the Island.  What aspects of this agreement are really critical to KRA and what concessions should the Town seek?

Potential negotiating points.  Based on the information presented in this article, here are some potential negotiating points.  The list is obviously not complete, and the order does not prioritize.

  • Changes to KICA Covenants and voting procedures that would convey true control of the association to property owners

  • Development density at Cougar Island

  • Hotel development at Beachwalker Park

  • Commercial or high-density residential development adjacent to Mingo Point

  • Resolution of long-standing issues regarding control and operation of Kiawah Island Utility (KIU)

  • KRA payment of impact fees to Kiawah Island Utility (KIU) to fund additional capacity for new development

  • Town acquisition of KRA properties surrounding the Municipal Building off Beachwalker Drive

  • Additional property for active recreation or conservation purposes (in addition to what was previously promised and not yet given).  Ed. Note:  Little Bear is now under Conservation Easement to Ducks Unlimited and Kiawah Conservancy. 

Become informed!  This article has just begun to scratch the surface of this highly complex issue.  The 1994 Town Notes and January 1995 TALK article cited here provide excellent background and are available at www.kiawah.org.  The core of the 1994 DA is contained in the first 65 pages.  Copies of that section, the 1994 Comprehensive Plan, and the current Comprehensive Plan are available in Town Hall.  

Become involved!  Mr. Darby’s February 15 letter asks each of us to write to our Town Officials and let them know where we stand.  It is probably far too early for most of us to take a position on KRA’s request yet.  It is likely, however, that we can all stand together in support of a process that is as open and public as it was in 1994.

The Town negotiates from a position of strength in 2005 as we have more leverage than we did in 1994.  We could simply stand pat and let the existing DA expire.  Once the Mayor signs, there will be little opportunity for additional negotiation for the duration of the new agreement. 

This is not a time to take sides.  This is a time to come together to understand the complex issues that face us and to determine collectively what kind of place Kiawah will be in the future.  KPOG calls upon Mayor Wert and Town Council to begin a public dialogue now.  Let’s start with informational meetings so that we can all become better educated about what is really at stake here and become informed partners in the process.   Kiawah property owners deserve the opportunity to provide input to the process before the process is over.  This public discussion will strengthen the Town’s negotiating position when our elected officials speak with the force of our collective priorities.