|
1. KICA
ISSUES |
|
KRA – THE
DEVELOPER |
PROPERTY
OWNERS |
DISCUSSION |
|
Retains
control over KICA Covenants (p23 and Exh. 18.1) |
|
KRA
contributes approximately 5% of KICA assessments and has
only a single KRA Director on the Board, yet KRA retains
final say whether Covenant changes can be proposed to the
membership. See example of critical Covenant in Discussion
immediately below. |
|
Easier for
KRA to bring new properties under KICA Covenants. ’94 DA
requires 6 of 7 KICA Directors to vote to accept contiguous
or near contiguous properties west of Main Gate for
inclusion under KICA Covenants; ’05 DA reduces this to
simple majority of Board (’05, p24; Cov, Art 11, Sect 2) |
|
When ‘94 DA
was signed, there were 3 Property Owner Directors and 4
Developer Directors. Therefore 2 of 3 Property Owner
Directors (2/3) had to vote with Developer. ’05 DA requires
only simple majority of Board (1 Developer Director and 3
Property Owner Directors), rather than a majority of
Property Owner Directors (4 of 6). Once under the KICA
umbrella, Covenants stipulate those properties can be called
“Kiawah Island.” When ‘05 DA first posted on Town website
(8/23/05), no KICA Board of Directors’ approval was
required to bring properties into KICA. This issue was
addressed only when a non-resident property owner brought it
to Council’s attention at a public meeting. When ’05 DA
expires, Covenants will again prevail and KRA will be able
to bring properties into KICA “without further consent of
the Association.” |
|
|
KRA waives
right to appoint majority of KICA Board (p23 and Exh. 18.1) |
Waiver
posted to Town website as of 9/27/05 still does not contain
language making this waiver permanent, as it would be under
the terms of the ’94 DA, and as the Town has publicly agreed
it should be. ‘94 DA precluded KRA’s exercising this right
during the life of the ‘94 DA and on 1/1/08, the day after
that agreement expires, KRA would have been required to sign
permanent waiver. ‘05 DA requires waiver be signed within
30 days of execution of ‘05 DA and doesn’t say
“permanently.”
KRA’s
Delaware partnership filing lists D&W Investment, Inc. and
TWD, LLC as the general partners of KRA ,with Buddy Darby as
President of D&W and Manager of the LLC. These same two
entities are the signatories to Exh. 18.1 of the ’05 DA (KRA’s
waiver of its right to appoint majority of KICA Board), but
neither is mentioned in ’05 DA as an entity related to KRA.
It also has not been explained why these two entities should
not be included in ’05 DA. It is unclear what legal impact
such an omission may have on the waiver Darby will be
executing on their behalf. |
|
KICA annual
assessment reduced from 150% to 100% on marsh island
properties, such as
Terrapin
Island,
Summer Islands, etc. (’94, p11) |
|
Elimination
of this provision of ‘94 DA means additional costs of upkeep
on deteriorating bridges to these islands, some of which
have facilities available only to neighborhood residents.
These costs will be borne by all property
owners. Even if no other marsh islands are developed, KICA
would only be able to assess a higher fee for properties on
already developed islands if KRA approved submission of a
referendum to all property owners. |
|
|
Dual
majority no longer required to appoint KICA General Manager
and Director of Security |
Dual
Majority means there must be a majority of Developer
Directors and a majority of Property Owner Directors
for approval. This was important in ‘94 to protect specific
individuals who held these positions at that time. Both
incumbents in ‘94 are no longer employed by KICA.
|
|
|
No dual
majority required to approve expenditure of MR/R funds |
MR/R stands
for KICA Major Repair and Replacement funds, which are used
for maintenance and repair of KICA infrastructure (roads,
culverts, etc.). This has never been an item of contention. |
|
|
KICA Board
gains right to relocate KICA offices without KRA approval |
The
significance of this item is unclear because KICA does not
currently own any property to which its offices could be
relocated. |
|
|
KICA Board
gains right to control its own operations |
Standards
Manual included in ‘94 DA controlled KICA operations. ‘05
DA eliminates Standards Manual. At 9/9/05 public hearing,
Leonard Long, a KRA principal, stated publicly that
Standards Manual had been “largely ignored and on the shelf
gathering dust all these years.”
|
|
|
Sora Rail
maintenance tract donated to KICA (p18) |
KRA to
convey .15 acres for maintenance tract to KICA by quitclaim
deed. Quitclaim deeds are used without warranty of title.
|
|
No land for
Security Pass Admin. |
|
KICA Board
specifically requested property for this purpose. |
|
|
KICA can
appoint 1 member of ARB if it so desires (p10) |
This right
already exists under KICA Covenants (Art VII, Sect 1) which
stipulate (1) all members of the ARB “be appointed by the
Board of Directors of the Association” and (2) at least one
member of the Association, other than the Developer’s
representatives, shall be a member of the ARB. KICA has not
exercised its right to appoint members of the ARB.
|